<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Commentary:  Drugstore vs. Department Store Skin Care Products</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.futurederm.com/2007/11/05/are-expensive-skin-care-products-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.futurederm.com/2007/11/05/are-expensive-skin-care-products-better/</link>
	<description>Perspectives from a future dermatologist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:27:07 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 5 Luxury Products Worth the Splurge – Even Now &#124;</title>
		<link>http://www.futurederm.com/2007/11/05/are-expensive-skin-care-products-better/comment-page-1/#comment-2967</link>
		<dc:creator>5 Luxury Products Worth the Splurge – Even Now &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurederm.com/?p=59#comment-2967</guid>
		<description>[...] course, as I have pointed out before, luxury (i.e., traditionally more expensive or department store-grade) products are not always [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] course, as I have pointed out before, luxury (i.e., traditionally more expensive or department store-grade) products are not always [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5 Luxury Products Worth the Splurge &#8211; Even Now &#171; FutureDerm.WordPress.com</title>
		<link>http://www.futurederm.com/2007/11/05/are-expensive-skin-care-products-better/comment-page-1/#comment-2907</link>
		<dc:creator>5 Luxury Products Worth the Splurge &#8211; Even Now &#171; FutureDerm.WordPress.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurederm.com/?p=59#comment-2907</guid>
		<description>[...] course, as I have pointed out before, luxury (i.e., traditionally more expensive or department store-grade) products are not always [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] course, as I have pointed out before, luxury (i.e., traditionally more expensive or department store-grade) products are not always [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5 Luxury Products Worth the Splurge - FutureDerm.com</title>
		<link>http://www.futurederm.com/2007/11/05/are-expensive-skin-care-products-better/comment-page-1/#comment-2906</link>
		<dc:creator>5 Luxury Products Worth the Splurge - FutureDerm.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurederm.com/?p=59#comment-2906</guid>
		<description>[...] course, as I have pointed out before, luxury (i.e., traditionally more expensive or department store-grade) products are not always [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] course, as I have pointed out before, luxury (i.e., traditionally more expensive or department store-grade) products are not always [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scarlett</title>
		<link>http://www.futurederm.com/2007/11/05/are-expensive-skin-care-products-better/comment-page-1/#comment-1628</link>
		<dc:creator>Scarlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurederm.com/?p=59#comment-1628</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t like Paula Begoun. She practises a kind of Cosmetologic FUNDAMENTALISM that derives in Populism.

I find she is a REDUCTIONIST and lacks a real scientific background about the complexity and variability of human skin and living beings.

Besides, she seems also to lack a transversal view on contemporary culture, which is a very important factor to critizise marketplace, branding, material culture, emotional  factors on consumer products, etc from an anthropological perspective.

I would summarize her books and approach as INTRUSISM, over-simplification and pure POPULISM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like Paula Begoun. She practises a kind of Cosmetologic FUNDAMENTALISM that derives in Populism.</p>
<p>I find she is a REDUCTIONIST and lacks a real scientific background about the complexity and variability of human skin and living beings.</p>
<p>Besides, she seems also to lack a transversal view on contemporary culture, which is a very important factor to critizise marketplace, branding, material culture, emotional  factors on consumer products, etc from an anthropological perspective.</p>
<p>I would summarize her books and approach as INTRUSISM, over-simplification and pure POPULISM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joyce</title>
		<link>http://www.futurederm.com/2007/11/05/are-expensive-skin-care-products-better/comment-page-1/#comment-1333</link>
		<dc:creator>Joyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurederm.com/?p=59#comment-1333</guid>
		<description>This is a great post. I buy my skin care products from the drug store. I use Cetaphil and would consider getting the Neutrogena sunblock and anti-wrinkle cream. Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great post. I buy my skin care products from the drug store. I use Cetaphil and would consider getting the Neutrogena sunblock and anti-wrinkle cream. Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quick Question: Does a $5 moisturizer have any benefit? - FutureDerm.com</title>
		<link>http://www.futurederm.com/2007/11/05/are-expensive-skin-care-products-better/comment-page-1/#comment-836</link>
		<dc:creator>Quick Question: Does a $5 moisturizer have any benefit? - FutureDerm.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 23:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurederm.com/?p=59#comment-836</guid>
		<description>[...] However, as Dr. Brandt is quick to point out, there are lots of other ingredients that are clinically proven to improve the skin too.  At any rate, though, don&#8217;t be fooled into thinking expensive is automatically better.  Although it is true that expensive creams often have better presentation and new ingredients (like the vitamin B5-derivative nicotinic acid in the NIA24 line), more drugstore-based skin care companies are putting extensive funds into R&amp;D and coming up with some equally impressive ingredients (like the vitamin B5-derivative niacinamide in some Olay and Cover Girl products).  The key is to stay educated!  (For a full post on drugstore versus department store products, please click here.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] However, as Dr. Brandt is quick to point out, there are lots of other ingredients that are clinically proven to improve the skin too.  At any rate, though, don&#8217;t be fooled into thinking expensive is automatically better.  Although it is true that expensive creams often have better presentation and new ingredients (like the vitamin B5-derivative nicotinic acid in the NIA24 line), more drugstore-based skin care companies are putting extensive funds into R&amp;D and coming up with some equally impressive ingredients (like the vitamin B5-derivative niacinamide in some Olay and Cover Girl products).  The key is to stay educated!  (For a full post on drugstore versus department store products, please click here.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
