One common source of parabens is deodorant. Photo source ehponline.org
Parabens are preservatives that are found in about 90% of all skincare and cosmetics products. Antibacterial and antifungal p-hydroxybenzoic acid esters, the six most commonly used forms of paraben are Methylparaben, Ethylparaben, p-Propylparaben, Isobutylparaben, n-Butylparaben and Benzylparaben. They are commonly used due to their relatively unique property of being effective preservatives and being correlated with a low incidence of contact dermatitis, according to the American Journal of Contact Dermatitis. However, controversy has risen over paraben use in skin care and cosmetics, implicating that parabens may cause cancer, influence estrogen levels, accumulate in tissues, and increase UVB-mediated DNA damage. Despite these findings and consumer alarm, based on current scientific findings, parabens in skin care and cosmetics are safe, although sunscreen use with paraben-containing products may be suggested. Here is what has been established:
Parabens and Breast Cancer
Controversy over parabens began largely in the late 1990’s, due to the suggestions that parabens bind to estrogen receptors in MCF-7 breast cancer cells and rat uteri [after oral administration of parabens]. It was also suggested that parabens upregulate estrogenic gene expression in human breast cancer cells, yeast cells, and in vivo in fish. Studies with immature mice and rats showed that subjection to parabens decreased uterine weight. It was finally suggested that parabens increased breast cancer cell proliferation, and parabens were found in breast tumor samples.
However, none of these studies hold practical implications for skin care products. In the breast cancer cell study, MCF-7 human breast cancer cells are subjected to parabens in one million-fold molar excess, thousands of times beyond the amount of parabens a patient is subjected to in a typical skin care product application. Similarly, parabens bound to estrogen receptor sites in rat uteri at far higher concentrations than paraben levels found in skin care products. In the study with fish, parabens were ingested by the fish in doses between 100 and 300 mg/kg, which amounts to about 15000 mg of parabens for the average 74 kg American woman. (To put this in perspective, a normal application of a skin care product [sunscreen] amounts to 1 mg of product per cm2 of skin, the average human body has 14800 cm2 of skin, the average skin care product is about 1% parabens and 20-60% [depending on paraben type] crosses the skin, resulting in about 60 mg of parabens, or roughly 1/24 the amount used in the study).
With regards to the parabens found in breast tumors, it sounds scary, but it is reassuring to know that no studies have shown that parabens are found in higher concentration in breast tumor samples than any other type of human body tissue. Nor has it ever been established that parabens were the cause of the breast tumors. In fact, parabens in practical concentrations have been established since 1984 as non-mutagenic, and no studies to date have ever shown parabens to be harmful below concentrations of 10-6 M. Finally, no studies have ever established that parabens induce cancer in benign cells. For this reason, the U.S. FDA declared in 2005 that parabens in the concentrations found in skin care products and cosmetics (up to 25%, but typically 1%) pose no logical risk to the consumer.
Parabens and Long-Term Use
In 2007, a French study reopened speculation against parabens when it suggested that parabens may accumulate in tissues over time. In the study, a realistic amount (0.45 mg) of parabens was applied to the skin’s surface every 12 hours for 36 hours. It was found that repeated applications every 12 hours increased quantities of parabens moving across the skin barrier for the first 24 hours. However, the results also showed that parabens applied to the skin had no cumulative effect 36 hours later, suggesting that parabens do not accumulate in the skin at all after one-and-a-half days. As such, parabens in skin care products do not accumulate in tissues after 36 hours, and thereby should not pose a risk for the lifetime skin care product user.
Butylparaben and sperm counts
In a 2002 study, it was found that butylparaben consumption as 1% of the daily diet in the mouse significantly reduced sperm counts, and as little as 0.1% butylparaben in the daily diet somewhat altered sperm counts. However, just 0.1% butylparaben in the daily diet amounts to about 775 mg/day of butylparaben for the average American consuming 775 g of food each day. This is hundreds of times more than the average skin care product application over the entire body*. As such, it is very impractical to assume that sperm counts in humans can be reduced from using skin care products.
*Assuming, as above: a normal application of a skin care product [sunscreen] amounts to 1 mg of product per cm2 of skin, the average human body has 14800 cm2 of skin, the average skin care product is about 1% parabens and 20-60% [depending on paraben type] crosses the skin, resulting in about 60 mg of parabens per full-body skin care product application].
Methylparaben may increase UV-induced damage
In a 2006 study in Toxicology, cultured keratinocytes (human skin cells) subjected to practical levels of methylparaben and cultured in methylparaben-containing solution for 24 hours were more subject to UVB-damage than cells that were not cultured in methylparaben. However, cells cultured in methylparaben and not subjected to UVB damage were unaffected.
From this study, two questions are raised. One, does this apply to skin cells in vivo, or only in culture? Clinical trials with patients should be conducted. (If they are and I see it, I will post.) Two, does this suggest that sunscreens should always be used in conjunction with methylparaben-containing products? One cannot really answer the second question without answering the first. Hopefully, the scientific community will provide the answer soon!
Other Sources
Other sources of excellent factual information on parabens:
Overall Opinion
Based on current research, typical paraben exposure from skin care products does not seem to increase health risks. I think my favorite quote on avoiding parabens and using paraben-free products comes from Oprah Magazine’s beauty editor, Valerie Monroe: “If you’re the kind of person who triple-locks and checks her doors, you’ll use [paraben-free products].” Yet, based on the current scientific research, there does not seem to be health risks from paraben use in typical skin care products, so I myself am sticking to my tried-and-true favorite beauty products, regardless of paraben content.
I will certainly repost if I read any scientific studies or articles that suggest risks of parabens in the future.




Get my book!










[...] For the full article, please click here. [...]
I have also asked this question and researched on the subject of parabens. Great topic and great points made here.
Preservatives are necessary to give our beauty products shelf life, and parabens are probably the least expensive, most effective way to accomplish this. However, alternative and possibly safer preservatives should be investigated. I appreciate beauty companies that consider the possibility that parabens might be harmful, and change their product despite the expense and inconvenience this may cause them.
I don’t triple lock my doors, but I certainly lock them, and check them before I go to sleep at night. Due to the sheer quantity and continual use of beauty items in our daily lives, I am trying to be more selective of what I purchase for myself and my family.
Thank you for posting this entry. I was trying to see what the big deal was with PABA.. Lots of high end skincare use it.. and I didn’t want to toss away so many of my skincare and cosmetic items!!
[...] like sodium lauryl sulfate, are known to cause skin irritation in many patients, other ingredients, like parabens, have only been found to raise health concerns in the majority of patients only when used in [...]
[...] like sodium lauryl sulfate, are known to cause skin irritation in many patients, other ingredients, like parabens, have only been found to raise health concerns in the majority of patients only when used in [...]
I appreciate the post. There seems to be a lot of companies and individuals who exploit the consumer’s lack of understanding of chemistry and biology (particularly here in the US). Researching REAL data on the potential harm of a compound, or a collection of compounds, at real-world concentrations when used on the body is a herculean task. There is so much hype about ‘organic’ and ’safe’ that the reality gets obscured with all the hand-waving and shouting. So many people get lost in the maze of claims and counter-claims.
As a granola-type that is also a chemist, I get really frustrated when my friends go on about the ‘chemicals’ in this or that — they would do well to take a food microbiology, soil microbiology or basic chemistry class. So much of the fear that the scare-mongers prey on is due to ignorance. Thanks for taking the time to treat this sliver of chemistry in a mature fashion.
BTW, I can’t seem to pull up your link for http://www.health-report.co.uk/parabens_industry_view.htm Do you have a PDF or update for that page?
Many people dismiss the controversy over parabens. However, if Europe had Parabens banned all together, I think it’s only wise to avoid them. After all, they’re an unnecessary risk. There have been links to cancer and in a Cornell University study, they found parabens intact within breast cancer tumors. http://envirocancer.cornell.edu/newsletter/articles/v9rc.parabens.cfm
Think about it…this is something we are applying to our skin every single day, acne medication, soap, shampoo, lotions. There could be severe complication after long term use.
Finally a voice of reason on this site – Dan is correct. Just like Bispheol A (BPA) that was discovered in 1917 and used in plastics even today parabens are not safe ingredients.
With women absorbing betwen 3 – 5 lbs of chemicals annually the notion that ingredients that are oestrogenic and have been found in breast cancer tissue, urinary excretion and linked to fertility problems would be “fine” for use is ridiculous.
Here’s the issue. The science is conflicting because of the MONEY trail. The same consumer watchdog groups and academic centers (non-profit) that pressed the issue with BPA are fighting twisted science from the Consumer Products companies (for-profit) that don’t want to redo their ingredients.
Why in god’s name would anyone suggest that a person simply proceed in using products with parabens when there are plenty of other excellent products that don’t have them???
Nicki – you are a medical student and you know the oath that you’ll be asked to take upon graduation — “first do no harm.” This is the approach we should all take with parabens. WHY TAKE THE RISK — FIRST DO NO HARM!!!
Thank you for the forum.
Wow- The link to the Cornell University video was very revealing! Parabens being equated to Environmental Estrogens! I don’t know why anyone would take the unnecessary risk and continue to apply products with Parabens until the additional study results come out. Too many of my peers are being diagnosed with cancer!
Yeah. And they used to spray DDT on people @ Coney Island to keep mosquitoes away. And BPA was safe in our plastic bottles. Wake up and smell the benzene.
If someone produced an acne treatment that was paraben free, would that product take precedent over products that contain parabens? I have read about this product CTRL. It claims to be paraben free, has anyone used or heard of this product?
I have stayed away from beauty products, I.V.s and latex products – all containing methylparaben for several years now. Methylparaben is commonly used with latex products. Since staying away from parabens, my skin is significantly less red. Hospitals have to reformulate any “sticks” and I heal significantly faster. It is difficult to explain just how much faster my healing took place after major surgery last year without parabens and latex products.(I compare to my c-section 15 years ago, gallbadder 13 years ago, and another surgery 3 years ago). My advice: Stay away from parabens (and latex). Plenty of healthier alternatives abound.
[...] are higher than the amount of parabens absorbed through the skin (50-60 mg/day, verifiable by this calculation, amounting to just 0.64 mg/kg/day for the average 86.6 kg male and 0.74 mg/kg/day for the average [...]
[...] are higher than the amount of parabens absorbed through the skin (50-60 mg/day, verifiable by this calculation, amounting to just 0.64 mg/kg/day for the average 86.6 kg male and 0.74 mg/kg/day for the average [...]
Your skin does not absorb 3-5 lbs of chemicals.
[...] 2007 a French study was conducted to see whether parabens accumulate in the skin. The findings were that with a realistic application [...]
[...] Unfortunately, use of paraben-free deodorant may actually increase your risk of skin irritation. According to one of my favorite dermatologists, founder and chief of the Department of Cosmetic Dermatology at the University of Miami and author of The Skin Type Solution, Dr. Leslie Baumann, M.D., parabens in deodorants may be less irritating than natural ingredients. As Dr. Baumann states in her blog on March 16, 2009, “Natural ingredients are much more likely than parabens to cause a skin rash. ” Indeed, most scientists conclude that parabens in the concentrations found in deodorants are safe, as Dr. Baumann establishes in the October 2007 issue of Entrepreneur magazine: “For those not allergic to parabens, there are no scientifically established reasons to avoid the plethora of cosmetic and skin care products that contain these preservatives.” (For more on parabens, please visit this very comprehensive review of parabens by Dr. Baumann, and a brief FutureDerm review here.) [...]
[...] Unfortunately, use of paraben-free deodorant may actually increase your risk of skin irritation. According to one of my favorite dermatologists, founder and chief of the Department of Cosmetic Dermatology at the University of Miami and author of The Skin Type Solution, Dr. Leslie Baumann, M.D., parabens in deodorants may be less irritating than natural ingredients. As Dr. Baumann states in her blog on March 16, 2009, “Natural ingredients are much more likely than parabens to cause a skin rash. ” Indeed, most scientists conclude that parabens in the concentrations found in deodorants are safe, as Dr. Baumann establishes in the October 2007 issue of Entrepreneur magazine: “For those not allergic to parabens, there are no scientifically established reasons to avoid the plethora of cosmetic and skin care products that contain these preservatives.” (For more on parabens, please visit this very comprehensive review of parabens by Dr. Baumann, and a brief FutureDerm review here.) [...]
[...] now, based on what has been established as truth, there seems to be little reason to be overly concerned about the presence of parabens in [...]
parabens have not been banned in Europe or Japan, that is simply an internet myth.