Product Review: stila Perfecting Concealer and Pressed Powder

032108-stila-perfecting-powder-and-concealer.bmp

At the request of some readers, I decided to go ahead and review more cosmetics.  :-)  Two I have recently been asked to review are stila Perfecting Concealer ($22.00, Amazon.com) and stila Pressed Powder ($28.00, Amazon.com).  Both claim to keep a control on shine, while disguising your noticeable flaws.  But are they really effective?  Read on…

A very good concealer

stila Perfecting Concealer contains high concentrations of hydrogenated polyisobutene and talc, giving the formula a thickened consistency.  Talc is the softest mineral, and is often used in oil-absorbing cosmetics for its efficacy.  Although talc has been speculated to cause skin cancer in the past, this is because older forms of talc contained potentially carcinogenic asbestiform amphibole fibers. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) considers non-asbestiform talc, as in stila Perfecting Concealer, to be Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) for use in cosmetics.  stila Perfecting Concealer also contains silica, which helps skin reflect the light after application.

stila Perfecting Concealer goes on thick and covers extremely well.  The best part is that it dries evenly and with a light sheen from the silica particles.  Once completely dry (after about five minutes), it can be layered with another coat for those especially hard-to-conceal places.

A light but concealing powder

stila Pressed Powder also conceals well, with a high concentration of opaque talc.  It also contains silica to reflect the light, and mineral oil to moisturize the skin.  A small amount of vitamin E provides a bit of antioxidant powder, but it is such a small amount (<1%, most likely) that it’s not really a selling point.

What is a selling point in stila Pressed Powder is the way it makes your skin look perfect over stila Perfecting Concealer.  I’m usually a big believer in skin care over cosmetics, but these products made my skin look airbrushed.

Bottom line:  Makes good skin look better

If you have good skin already, stila Perfecting Concealer and stila Pressed Powder disguise flaws and reflect the light, making your skin look even better.

On the other hand, if you have some problems with your skin, you may want to try a powder with more skin-nourishing ingredients.  For instance, if your skin is acne-prone, you may want to try a powder that contains salicyclic acid instead, like Neutrogena Skin-Clearing Oil Free Pressed Powder ($19.98 for two, Amazon.com).  Or, if your skin is dry and shows some fine lines and age spots, you may want to try a powder that contains niacinamide, like the new Cover Girl Advanced Radiance Age-Defying Pressed Powder ($16.62 for two, Amazon.com).

Bottom line: stila Perfecting Concealer and stila Pressed Powder are great for a cosmetic cover-up.  They don’t contain many skin-benefiting ingredients, but if you’ve been treating your skin right all along, these work like airbrushing!  :-)  Product Rating:  8/10 (Value for the money: 2/3.  Efficacy (at concealing): 3/3.  Concentration of effective (at concealing) ingredients: 3/3.  Sunscreen: 0/1).

Ingredients in stila Perfecting Concealer

Hydrogenated polyisobutene, talc, caprylic/capric triglyceride, squalane, dipentaerythrityl hexahydroxystearate/hexastearate/hexarosinate, hydrogenated styrene/ isoprene copolymer, nylon-12, ethylhexyl stearate, stearalkonium hectorite, boron nitride, tocopheryl linoleate, caprylyl glycol, hexylene glycol, propylene carbonate, bht, phenoxyethanol, [+/- titanium dioxide (ci 77891), iron oxides (ci 77491, ci 77492, ci 77499), ultramarines (ci 77007)]

Ingredients in stila Pressed Powder

Talc, Polymethyl Methacrylate, Silica, Zea Mays (Corn) Starch, Octyldodecyl Lactate, Isononyl Isononanoate, Pentaerythrityl Tetraisostearate, Cetearyl EthylHexanoate, Helianthus Annuus (Sunflower) Seed Oil, Avena Sativa (Oat) Kernel Extract, Caprylyl Glycol, Hexylene Glycol, Ethylhexylglycerin, Dimethicone, Zeolite, Nylon 12, Zinc Stearate, BHT, Phenoxyethanol, Sorbic Acid, May Contain (+/-): Mica, Titanium Dioxide (CI 77891), Iron Oxides (CI 77491, CI 77492, CI 77499), Ultramarines (CI 77007)

Related Posts

  • 66
    According to New Jersey plastic surgeon Dr. Sam Rizk, M.D., in an interview in this week's Star, there are several differences between ablative and non-ablative lasers: Ablative Lasers Also called: Erbium, CO2 Treatments needed: 1 Used for: Wrinkle reduction, tissue tightening Relative downtime: Significant. Up to 10 days post-treatment. Non-Ablative Lasers Also called: Fraxel, Affirm…

by Nicki Zevola

2 thoughts on “Product Review: stila Perfecting Concealer and Pressed Powder

  1. Pingback: Quick Question: What is the Difference between an Ablative and Non-Ablative Laser? « FutureDerm.WordPress.com

  2. Julia says:

    Ladies, please inform yourselves, go beyond various bloggs paid for by cosmetic industry that has only one goal to make money and make you sick in the process (yes, you don’t see the people queuing for surgery at melanoma skin cancer centers like it’s the rush hour, as I judt did, I always loved cosmetics and perfumes, until I got sick and had to take contyrol of my life and learn, not wait to be TOLD by someone that has a financial interest), there is a wealth of info on-line. Please google the ingredients and read how dangerous most of them are, regardless of the seller’s claims:

    Q. Why is talc harmful?

    A. Talc is closely related to the potent carcinogen asbestos. Talc particles have been shown to cause tumors in the ovaries and lungs of cancer victims. For the last 30 years, scientists have closely scrutinized talc particles and found dangerous similarities to asbestos. Responding to this evidence in 1973, the FDA drafted a resolution that would limit the amount of asbestos-like fibers in cosmetic grade talc. However, no ruling has ever been made and today, cosmetic grade talc remains non-regulated by the federal government. This inaction ignores a 1993 National Toxicology Program report which found that cosmetic grade talc, without any asbestos-like fibers, caused tumors in animal subjects.1 Clearly with or without asbestos-like fibers, cosmetic grade talcum powder is a carcinogen.

    Q. What kind of exposure is dangerous?

    A. Talc is toxic. Talc particles cause tumors in human ovaries and lungs. Numerous studies have shown a strong link between frequent use of talc in the female genital area and ovarian cancer. Talc particles are able to move through the reproductive system and become imbedded in the lining of the ovary. Researchers have found talc particles in ovarian tumors and have found that women with ovarian cancer have used talcum powder in their genital area more frequently than healthy women.2

    same with mineral oil, all sunscreens (except zinc oxide – NON-MICRONIZED)and most of the cosmetic ingredients ald perfumes (phtalates)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>