<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Just In:  FDA Delays Proposed Sunscreen Labels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.futurederm.com/2008/08/02/this-just-in-fda-delays-proposed-sunscreen-labels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.futurederm.com/2008/08/02/this-just-in-fda-delays-proposed-sunscreen-labels/</link>
	<description>FutureDerm.com is a beauty, nutrition &#38; fitness, fashion &#38; style, and personal development blog. Futurederm.com has been named one of the top 30 beauty blogs in the world, and mentioned in Fitness magazine, The New York Times, Derm Matters (a publication of The Journal of Drugs in Dermatology), Skincare-news, and many more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:32:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wanda</title>
		<link>http://www.futurederm.com/2008/08/02/this-just-in-fda-delays-proposed-sunscreen-labels/comment-page-1/#comment-1632</link>
		<dc:creator>Wanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurederm.com/?p=652#comment-1632</guid>
		<description>This is just another example of the FDA doing what is best for big business and not what is best for the consumer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just another example of the FDA doing what is best for big business and not what is best for the consumer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vanity</title>
		<link>http://www.futurederm.com/2008/08/02/this-just-in-fda-delays-proposed-sunscreen-labels/comment-page-1/#comment-1571</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 01:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurederm.com/?p=652#comment-1571</guid>
		<description>Who cares? The US sunscreen market is behind on the rest of the world, another year or two shouldn&#039;t matter. The FDA should hurry up with approving new actives, cause many people are already importing European sunscreens. It&#039;s only bad for the US economy. But good for people&#039;s skin, since practically no one uses oxybenzone in Europe. Which is a very common photoallergen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares? The US sunscreen market is behind on the rest of the world, another year or two shouldn&#8217;t matter. The FDA should hurry up with approving new actives, cause many people are already importing European sunscreens. It&#8217;s only bad for the US economy. But good for people&#8217;s skin, since practically no one uses oxybenzone in Europe. Which is a very common photoallergen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

