<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unattainable Beauty: The Decade&#8217;s Most Egregrious Retouching Scandals (Newsweek)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.futurederm.com/2010/02/02/unattainable-beauty-the-decades-most-egregrious-retouching-scandals-newsweek-mot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.futurederm.com/2010/02/02/unattainable-beauty-the-decades-most-egregrious-retouching-scandals-newsweek-mot/</link>
	<description>Perspectives from a future dermatologist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:58:09 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cosmetics Beauty</title>
		<link>http://www.futurederm.com/2010/02/02/unattainable-beauty-the-decades-most-egregrious-retouching-scandals-newsweek-mot/comment-page-1/#comment-4576</link>
		<dc:creator>Cosmetics Beauty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 22:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurederm.com/?p=2320#comment-4576</guid>
		<description>Wonderful discussion! Your article brings up some very important and disturbing issue! If these already beautiful celebrities still aren&#039;t beautiful, maybe there is something wrong with our idea of beauty! Whatever happened to natural beauty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful discussion! Your article brings up some very important and disturbing issue! If these already beautiful celebrities still aren&#8217;t beautiful, maybe there is something wrong with our idea of beauty! Whatever happened to natural beauty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saffron</title>
		<link>http://www.futurederm.com/2010/02/02/unattainable-beauty-the-decades-most-egregrious-retouching-scandals-newsweek-mot/comment-page-1/#comment-4571</link>
		<dc:creator>saffron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 23:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurederm.com/?p=2320#comment-4571</guid>
		<description>Well done... more such truths is what the 21st century needs to empower the young and old alike..true beauty never lies in perfection as it simply does not exist except in one&#039;s own perception...The absence of flaw in beauty is itself a flaw. Beauty - in projection and perceiving - is 99.9% attitude</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done&#8230; more such truths is what the 21st century needs to empower the young and old alike..true beauty never lies in perfection as it simply does not exist except in one&#8217;s own perception&#8230;The absence of flaw in beauty is itself a flaw. Beauty &#8211; in projection and perceiving &#8211; is 99.9% attitude</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fawnie</title>
		<link>http://www.futurederm.com/2010/02/02/unattainable-beauty-the-decades-most-egregrious-retouching-scandals-newsweek-mot/comment-page-1/#comment-4562</link>
		<dc:creator>fawnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurederm.com/?p=2320#comment-4562</guid>
		<description>egregious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>egregious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goldi</title>
		<link>http://www.futurederm.com/2010/02/02/unattainable-beauty-the-decades-most-egregrious-retouching-scandals-newsweek-mot/comment-page-1/#comment-4536</link>
		<dc:creator>goldi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurederm.com/?p=2320#comment-4536</guid>
		<description>great post. thanks for bringing this to light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great post. thanks for bringing this to light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.futurederm.com/2010/02/02/unattainable-beauty-the-decades-most-egregrious-retouching-scandals-newsweek-mot/comment-page-1/#comment-4535</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurederm.com/?p=2320#comment-4535</guid>
		<description>Excellent post!  Some of these retouches are seriously over-the-top!  

Still, even knowing that I&#039;ll never look like Barbie certainly isn&#039;t going to put the brakes on my retinol/peptides/sunscreen routine!  

Here&#039;s my take: 
http://theskinstudio.blogspot.com/2010/02/attainable-beauty.html

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post!  Some of these retouches are seriously over-the-top!  </p>
<p>Still, even knowing that I&#8217;ll never look like Barbie certainly isn&#8217;t going to put the brakes on my retinol/peptides/sunscreen routine!  </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my take:<br />
<a href="http://theskinstudio.blogspot.com/2010/02/attainable-beauty.html" rel="nofollow">http://theskinstudio.blogspot.com/2010/02/attainable-beauty.html</a></p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivonne</title>
		<link>http://www.futurederm.com/2010/02/02/unattainable-beauty-the-decades-most-egregrious-retouching-scandals-newsweek-mot/comment-page-1/#comment-4526</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivonne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurederm.com/?p=2320#comment-4526</guid>
		<description>Yes, it&#039;s true and very obvious! I&#039;m glad that you posted this because these standards are so unreal and unfair. It simply reminds me that I shouldn&#039;t get caught up in trying to fit these standards of beauty because they are after all false. There is not just one way to be beautiful  and that is what the magazines are trying to get at!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it&#8217;s true and very obvious! I&#8217;m glad that you posted this because these standards are so unreal and unfair. It simply reminds me that I shouldn&#8217;t get caught up in trying to fit these standards of beauty because they are after all false. There is not just one way to be beautiful  and that is what the magazines are trying to get at!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://www.futurederm.com/2010/02/02/unattainable-beauty-the-decades-most-egregrious-retouching-scandals-newsweek-mot/comment-page-1/#comment-4523</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurederm.com/?p=2320#comment-4523</guid>
		<description>This is a great post!  I&#039;m always completely disgusted when I see photos that have OBVIOUSLY been retouched.  I would love to see a magazine where none of the photos area altered and anything featured costs less than $100.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great post!  I&#8217;m always completely disgusted when I see photos that have OBVIOUSLY been retouched.  I would love to see a magazine where none of the photos area altered and anything featured costs less than $100.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.futurederm.com/2010/02/02/unattainable-beauty-the-decades-most-egregrious-retouching-scandals-newsweek-mot/comment-page-1/#comment-4522</link>
		<dc:creator>joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futurederm.com/?p=2320#comment-4522</guid>
		<description>thank you so much for this nicki!  as a guy, i am most certainly not immune to these &quot;standards&quot; of beauty, male and female,  i see in magazines. though i know things get retouched and airbrushed i don&#039;t think i could imagine to this extent!  this article made me feel much better knowing these people don&#039;t look nearly like the images we see in the magazines!  perhaps i&#039;m doing just fine!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you so much for this nicki!  as a guy, i am most certainly not immune to these &#8220;standards&#8221; of beauty, male and female,  i see in magazines. though i know things get retouched and airbrushed i don&#8217;t think i could imagine to this extent!  this article made me feel much better knowing these people don&#8217;t look nearly like the images we see in the magazines!  perhaps i&#8217;m doing just fine!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
